Skip to content
SuperBlueHubBase covers the latest in artificial intelligen…

Tetris Couldn't Triumph at The Game Awards — Another Award Type Might Solve This

Each time a significant prize-giving event approaches, one notices a clamor to include of new categories to honor overlooked contributions and satisfy the passions of enthusiasts dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator has already made supporting a scary games classification. That would be fantastic. So would tabletop games, representing a passionate advocate's mission. But they will have to forgive me if I try to elbow in front since similar to dedicated enthusiasts, I have a cast-iron argument supporting my request stands as crucial and significant. The demand is this: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Classifying creative works isn't exact; it’s very subjective, and it will always spark debates concluding with vague boundaries. This explains why movie academies don’t do it. Yet it remains an essential concession for the industry of gaming, showing incredible range it's challenging to consider them a single creative category.

For the full spectrum of gaming accomplishments to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards offer these genre categories for Action, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these classifications actually cover numerous genres, and you can find room for numerous titles.

Not so for logic-based experiences. No suitable classification appears for their placement. Think about these outstanding current releases, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles in a particular game, fast-paced pattern recognition in a different title, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles from additional release. What category would fit them between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.

Acknowledgment Issues

Many instances occur outstanding logic titles launched regularly without proper recognition during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit for categories like Mobile Game, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging Indie races.

  • A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated for anything that year
  • A different innovative game was excluded in 2019
  • Popular arranging title was overlooked recently
  • Only a few puzzle games scraped into niche award types

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're compact experiences, however the design behind logic titles is of massive significance. Iconic mobile puzzle games count as most popular titles in the world maintaining this status for over a decade.

The iconic tile-matching title competes with well-known building titles claiming status as highest-selling title ever; it also contends for best game of all time. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks for gaming as medium, and they are in conversation with almost every other genre.

The Solution and Justification

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. You could fill a field of five interesting, varied, worthy titles each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these include experiences without proper classification at major gaming awards. Puzzle game makers operate at the challenging frontier interactive creation, producing among essential manifestations of gaming itself. Similar to cinema stunt performers, they deserve recognition. Don't make them wait generations.

About the author

Ryan Whitney

Liam is a tech journalist with a passion for AI, blockchain, and future technologies, exploring how they shape our world.

SuperBlueHubBase

Type to search articles.